(봄학기) 부동산경매중급반 모집 中
Sweden allows nearly 10% of wolf population to be killed. The government wants an even more drastic cull
Sweden began its annual wolf hunt this week, allowing nearly 10% of the endangered species population to be killed, as conservationists raise concerns about the controversial policy.
Since 2010, Sweden has allowed wolves to be hunted on a licensed quota basis. Conservationists say this goes against European Union law and have filed complaints with the EU Commission, which has previously said it is assessing Sweden’s compliance.
Hunted to the point of extinction by the 1970s, wolves have gradually returned to the northern European country, aided by EU conservation legislation.
But now the government is allowing 30 of the estimated 375 animals there to be culled, citing safety concerns for rural dwellers and livestock owners.
It’s part of the government’s effort to drastically reduce the overall number of wolves in the country – from a previous minimum population of 300 to a new minimum of 170. This minimum number, under Sweden’s Environmental Protection Agency, is referred to as a "favorable reference value."
This is despite the wolf’s status as "highly threatened" on The Swedish Red List, which monitors the extinction risk of species in the Nordic country.
Conservationists were further alarmed last month when the Council of Europe’s Bern Convention committee, which includes 49 countries and the European Union, voted in favor of an EU proposal to lower the protection status of wolves from "strictly protected" to "protected." The convention was originally established to protect species and habitats.
"Strictly protected" status meant wolves could not be deliberately killed or captured, but with the downgrading, the Council of Europe says member states will now have "additional flexibility" when managing their local wolf populations.
The World Wide Fund for ссылка на omg Nature (WWF) responded to the decision, calling the EU’s move to weaken wolf protections "a serious misstep, devoid of any solid scientific foundation."
https://edu.yju.ac.kr/board_CZrU19/9913
Omg Ссылка На Сайт
2025.01.09 22:27
Sweden allows nearly 10% of wolf population to be killed. The government wants an even more drastic cullSweden began its annual wolf hunt this week, allowing nearly 10% of the endangered species population to be killed, as conservationists raise concerns about the controversial policy.
Since 2010, Sweden has allowed wolves to be hunted on a licensed quota basis. Conservationists say this goes against European Union law and have filed complaints with the EU Commission, which has previously said it is assessing Sweden’s compliance.
Hunted to the point of extinction by the 1970s, wolves have gradually returned to the northern European country, aided by EU conservation legislation.
But now the government is allowing 30 of the estimated 375 animals there to be culled, citing safety concerns for rural dwellers and livestock owners.
It’s part of the government’s effort to drastically reduce the overall number of wolves in the country – from a previous minimum population of 300 to a new minimum of 170. This minimum number, under Sweden’s Environmental Protection Agency, is referred to as a "favorable reference value."
This is despite the wolf’s status as "highly threatened" on The Swedish Red List, which monitors the extinction risk of species in the Nordic country.
Conservationists were further alarmed last month when the Council of Europe’s Bern Convention committee, which includes 49 countries and the European Union, voted in favor of an EU proposal to lower the protection status of wolves from "strictly protected" to "protected." The convention was originally established to protect species and habitats.
"Strictly protected" status meant wolves could not be deliberately killed or captured, but with the downgrading, the Council of Europe says member states will now have "additional flexibility" when managing their local wolf populations.
The World Wide Fund for ссылка на omg Nature (WWF) responded to the decision, calling the EU’s move to weaken wolf protections "a serious misstep, devoid of any solid scientific foundation."
